The process of creation described in Genesis follows a structured and progressive transformation. The Hebrew terms Bara', Yatsar, Asah, Banah, and Qanah outline a sequence where each stage builds upon the previous one, forming a pathway from initiation to mastery.
To understand this deeper, we can explore two key approaches:
-
The Mathematical Equation Model – A function-based transformation where each stage amplifies the previous one, following a recursive or exponential growth pattern.
-
The Geometrical Representation Model – A spatial perspective that reveals whether creation follows a linear, hierarchical, or cyclical structure.
By analyzing these models, we can uncover the fundamental patterns that govern creation, growth, and mastery.
1. Mathematical Equation Approach
We need to define a function-based transformation where each stage builds upon the previous one. Given the nature of the terms, we can frame them as a process equation that describes growth, formation, function, structure, and mastery.
Equation Form: Growth Transformation
Each stage modifies an initial state and adds a transformation layer. We can express it as:
Q = B + Y(B) + A(Y) + Ba(A) + Q(Ba)
Where:
-
B = Bara' (Initial Creation, starting point)
-
Y(B) = Yatsar(B) (Shaping what was created)
-
A(Y) = Asah(Y) (Making the shaped entity functional)
-
Ba(A) = Banah(A) (Structuring the functional entity into systems)
-
Q(Ba) = Qanah(Ba) (Final acquisition, mastery)
Each function depends on the previous one, reinforcing a hierarchical structure.
Alternative Expression in Exponential Form:
A growth pattern where each stage amplifies the previous one can be expressed as:
Q = B * Y^x * A^y * Ba^z
Where x, y, z are transformation factors that determine how much each stage influences the next.
📌 Conclusion: The process follows a recursive, compounding function, where each stage adds or amplifies the previous one.
2. Geometrical Representation Approach
If we want a spatial or geometrical interpretation, we need to decide:
-
Is it linear (one step leads to the next)?
-
Is it cyclical (does it return to the beginning)?
-
Is it dimensional (each stage adds depth or a new perspective)?
A. The Linear Growth Model (Stepwise Construction)
Each step builds upon the previous one, forming a progressive pathway like a staircase or a sequence:
Bara' → Yatsar → Asah → Banah → Qanah
Graphically, it could be represented as a stepwise ascent (like a pyramid or staircase).
B. The Structural Pyramid Model (Hierarchical Organization)
If we see Bara' as the foundation and Qanah as the apex, we get a pyramid-like structure:
(Qanah)
▲
(Banah)
▲
(Asah)
▲
(Yatsar)
▲
(Bara')
-
Base (Bara') → Foundation, everything starts here.
-
Levels (Yatsar, Asah, Banah) → Each step refines the structure.
-
Apex (Qanah) → The final state, where mastery is achieved.
📌 Conclusion: A pyramid effectively represents how each stage supports the next, leading to a perfected state.
C. The Circular Growth Model (Recursive Mastery)
Another interpretation is that Bara' and Qanah connect in a loop, meaning mastery (Qanah) enables new acts of creation (Bara'). This suggests a cycle of continuous creation and refinement:
Bara' → Yatsar → Asah → Banah → Qanah
↑ ↓
(Cycle repeats as mastery leads to new creation)
This aligns with growth principles in nature, learning, and innovation—once mastery is reached, new creative processes begin again.
📌 Conclusion: This model suggests a spiral of creation, formation, function, structure, and mastery, cycling into higher levels of development.
Final Thoughts: Which Model Works Best?
✅ For a process equation: The exponential or recursive function best describes how each stage amplifies the previous one.
✅ For geometry: A pyramid represents a hierarchical structure, while a spiral/cycle captures continuous refinement and new creation.